CosmetiWood PRO
The filler engineered for the machine, developed together with the PAR-Filler lines by Fillosys. Filler and machine tuned as one system, so the line runs at capacity and the putty waste stays at 1%.
Filler and machine, engineered as one
Most lines run a generic putty through a generic head. PRO is different: the rheology of the filler and the dosing of the PAR-Filler are developed together. That is why the benchmark numbers look the way they do.
A PAR-Filler line by Fillosys running CosmetiWood PRO.
Machine line vs machine line
Benchmark production of 100,000 m²/year at €35/m² product value, total yearly cost of filling including machine depreciation, energy, labour, putty and lost board value:
| Per year | 2-head line, water-based | 2-head line, hotmelt | PAR-Filler Mono + PRO |
|---|---|---|---|
| Putty waste | 1.9% | 0.8% | 1.0% |
| Rejected boards | 4.9% | 4.3% | 3.1% |
| Operators | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| Total cost of filling | € 346,214 | € 321,936 | € 251,648 |
Full model, machine costs and editable assumptions in the true-cost calculator (switch to “Machine line”).
From hand to machine,
same chemistry
Producers who start with MAX cartridges move to PRO on a PAR-Filler without requalifying the finish: same adhesion, same colour system, same behaviour under lacquer. Your process grows; the filler doesn't change.
A line trial, properly done
- Test batch on your own boards, measured together
- Line settings tuned with the Fillosys engineers
- Total-cost calculation with your real numbers
- 60-day guarantee on the switch
Run the numbers for your line.
Professional wood fillers, engineered to lower the true cost of filling: fewer rejected boards, less rework, a faster line.
CosmetiWood PRO
The filler engineered for the machine, developed together with the PAR-Filler lines by Fillosys. Filler and machine tuned as one system, so the line runs at capacity and the putty waste stays at 1%.
Filler and machine, engineered as one
Most lines run a generic putty through a generic head. PRO is different: the rheology of the filler and the dosing of the PAR-Filler are developed together. That is why the benchmark numbers look the way they do.
A PAR-Filler line by Fillosys running CosmetiWood PRO.
Machine line vs machine line
Benchmark production of 100,000 m²/year at €35/m² product value, total yearly cost of filling including machine depreciation, energy, labour, putty and lost board value:
| Per year | 2-head line, water-based | 2-head line, hotmelt | PAR-Filler Mono + PRO |
|---|---|---|---|
| Putty waste | 1.9% | 0.8% | 1.0% |
| Rejected boards | 4.9% | 4.3% | 3.1% |
| Operators | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| Total cost of filling | € 346,214 | € 321,936 | € 251,648 |
Full model, machine costs and editable assumptions in the true-cost calculator (switch to “Machine line”).
From hand to machine,
same chemistry
Producers who start with MAX cartridges move to PRO on a PAR-Filler without requalifying the finish: same adhesion, same colour system, same behaviour under lacquer. Your process grows; the filler doesn't change.
A line trial, properly done
- Test batch on your own boards, measured together
- Line settings tuned with the Fillosys engineers
- Total-cost calculation with your real numbers
- 60-day guarantee on the switch
Run the numbers for your line.
Professional wood fillers, engineered to lower the true cost of filling: fewer rejected boards, less rework, a faster line.